Australia Reviews

SummaryFortress Investment Group LLC (Fortress) is an asset-based investment management company. It provides services to pension funds, endowments and foundations, financial institutions, funds of funds and high net worth individuals. The company elevates, invests and manages hedge funds and private equity funds. Fortress invests in the public equity, fixed income and alternative investment markets of the US and across the globe. The company is based in New York City with affiliate offices in Texas, San Diego, Dallas, California, Hong Kong, London and the UK as well as in Rome, Italy, Frankfurt, Germany, Geneva, Switzerland, Toronto, Dallas, Canada, Sydney and Australia.Fortress Investment Group LLC – Financial Analysis Review is an in-depth business, financial analysis of Fortress Investment Group LLC. The report provides a comprehensive insight into the company, including business structure and operations, executive biographies and key competitors. The hallmark of the report is the detailed financial ratios of the companyScope- Provides key company information for business intelligence needsThe report contains critical company information – business structure and operations, the company history, major products and services, key competitors, key employees and executive biographies, different locations and important subsidiaries.- The report provides detailed financial ratios for the past five years as well as interim ratios for the last four quarters.- Financial ratios include profitability, margins and returns, liquidity and leverage, financial position and efficiency ratios.Reasons to buy- A quick “one-stop-shop” to understand the company.- Enhance business/sales activities by understanding customers’ businesses better.- Get detailed information and financial analysis on companies operating in your industry.- Identify prospective partners and suppliers – with key data on their businesses and locations.- Compare your company’s financial trends with those of your peers / competitors.- Scout for potential acquisition targets, with detailed insight into the companies’ financial and operational performance.

For more information, please visit :

http://www.aarkstore.com/reports/Fortress-Investment-Group-LLC-Financial-Analysis-Review-27858.html

Or email us at press@aarkstore.com or call +919272852585

There’s nothing more to be said about the markets last week except that we all survived, battered, bruised, shell shocked and worse if you were shareholders in some American companies no longer with us like Lehman Bros, Merrill Lynch, AIG, Macquarie, HBOS and a host of other financial stocks.This week events will be dominated by the shape of the rescue body announced Friday to bailout the dodgy securities.Here in Australia we have banned all short selling, not just the naughty naked kind, in a new development revealed last night by the financial regulator, ASIC. It starts from today and continues until further notice.It is a step up of the ban on naked shorting announced Friday.But the big issue is the $US700 billion bailout fund which is likely to provide an opportunity for ambitious and idiotic US congress representatives to try and add pet deals of their own to the bill.Markets around the world simply love the idea, but that affection will be hard to hold as the fund takes ages to have any lasting impact.The Standard & Poor’s 500 dropped by more than 4.7% twice last week after Lehman Brothers’ collapse; Bank of America Corp’s takeover of Merrill Lynch and the US government’s seizure of American International Group.But the S&P 500 ended the week by jumping 8.5% on Thursday and Friday on the US government’s plan to purge banks of bad assets, crack down on short sellers and to stand behind money market funds through support from the Federal Reserve.Shanghai surged 9.5%, in the biggest daily gain for seven years, to 2,075.091.Hong Kong’s Hang Sang gained 9.6% to 19,327.73, London’s FTSE 100 had its biggest daily gain in its 24-year history, jumping 8.8% and in Australia the ASX 200 was up 198 points or more than 4.2% on Friday.It was the biggest two-day global stocks rally in 38 years. Friday’s rallies in London and the US were partially fuelled by bans on short-selling in financial stocks announced on Thursday night.Besides the S&P 500’s gains the Dow added 929 points from Thursday’s low and markets from the UK, China, and Australia and elsewhere surged as investors appreciated the fact that the great panic had been halted for the time being.But it is short term, even the new fund being set up to help buy the so-called toxic securities by the US Treasury.The longer term issues will be the newly increased size of the US deficit and debt, the impact of this huge expansion of money supply on inflation, and most of all the slumping US economy and the disaster that is the US housing sector.The S&P 500 ended up 48.57 points to 1,255.08 on Friday, the Dow surged 368.75, or 3.4%, to 11,388.44 and Nada rose 74.8, or 3.4%, to 2,273.9.The MSCI World Index of 23 developed nations’ markets jumped 5.7% to 1,286.44 on Friday and rose 8% over Thursday and Friday. Europe’s main regional index (the Sox 600) rose a record 8.3% Friday and the MSCI Asia Pacific Index added 5.5% Friday.The S&P 500 actually erased its fall to close up 0.3% for the week, but it is still down down 15% this year.Market reports said a record 3 billion shares were traded on the NYSE on Friday: that was more than double the three-month daily average.Under pressure investment banks, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley saw their shares leap more than 20% on Friday as shorts scrambled to cover themselves.Traders said that only consumer staples, the best performing group this year, fell led by Wal-Mart, the world’s largest retailer.Its shares fell almost 3% for the biggest decline in the Dow.That reaction has a touch of unreality because it won’t be too long before investors start worrying about the economy and banks again and go back into consumer staples.US and European government bonds tumbled; reversing gains made earlier in the week as investor sold equities and commodities and moved into bonds as quickly as possible.The proposal from Paulson and Bernanke (and strongly supported by president Bush over the weekend) is aimed at isolating devalued mortgage-linked assets at the root of the worst credit crisis since the Great Depression.US Congressional leaders said they aim to pass legislation soon, but some have started wondering about loans to US car companies like General Motors and a $US50 billion stimulatory package to follow the $US120 billion tax rebate which came and went from May to July of this year.That sort of grandstanding is going to be dangerous, and expensive.In Australia the major banks led the surge on Friday and today the market is forecast to be up by around 130 points, if Saturday morning’s overnight futures finish is any guide.The ASX200 index finished up 196.8 points, or 4.27%, to 4804.1, while the All Ordinaries index ended up 188.8 points, or 4.06%, to 4840.7.The National Australia Bank soared $3.40, or 17.35%, to $23.00; the Commonwealth jumped $2.62, or 6.54%, to $42.70; the ANZ rose $2.26, or 14.63%, to $17.71; and Westpac ended up $1.54, or 7%, at $23.54.But the focus was on Macquarie Group: after being belted up to the close Thursday, it rocketed $9.85, or 37.81%, to $35.90 after touching an intraday high of $38.55 just before noon.Suncor Metway leapt 75c to $9.10 as the company completed the underwriting on its dividend reinvestment plan two weeks early.In resources BHP Billiton ended up 40c at $35.40 and Rio Tinto jumped $3.10 to $101.50.Iron ore miner Fortescue Metals Group added 50c to $5.70 despite reporting an annual bottom-line net loss of $2.8 billion and saying it would not provide a forecast for the current year because it may prejudice “the interests of the company”.Oil and gas producer Woodside Petroleum was up $2.66 at $54.06, and Santos 53c to $18.28.Newmont dropped 55c to $4.92 and gold fell; Newcrest eased 65c to $23.85 and Lehar dropped 3c to $2.45.The Australian dollar finished higher in New York at 83.40, US cents after the US dollar lost ground as nervy investors sold the currency.Earlier, the Aussie had finished around 81.15 on Friday, up about 1.3 US from Thursday’s close of 79.88. That’s up 3.5c in two days, or almost 5%.And naked short selling will be banned on the Australian Stock Exchange from today.But in a dramatic decision the regulator, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission has banned ALL short selling for a month from today, not just the naked variety. ASIC said the widened ban would act as a circuit breaker to restore investor confidence.Short selling, where traders seek to profit by selling borrowed shares of companies to then buy them back, in the anticipation their prices will drop, has been partly blamed for the sharp falls of stocks such as Macquarie Group in recent days.Naked short selling, involves selling without first borrowing the stock, or even ensuring the shares can be borrowed.The Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) said on Friday it would remove all securities from its list of stocks approved for naked short selling from Monday.The ASX said the “The removal will remain in force until further notice.”"It will be reviewed when the government’s foreshadowed legislative amendments to the reporting of covered short selling activity take effect.”But last night the ASX ban was supplanted by the wider ban from ASIC.ASIC chairman, Tony D’Aloisio, said “To limit the prohibition to financial stocks, as has been done in the UK, could subject our other stocks to unwarranted attack given the unknown amount of global money which may be looking for short sell plays.”

IMPORTANT: AIR reports about financial markets and investment products in the widest sense possible. The AIR website and all its contents is prepared for general information only, and as such, the specific needs, investment objectives or financial situation of any particular user have not been taken into consideration. Individuals should therefore talk with their financial planner or advisor before making any investment decisions.

If anything, the current turmoil and its impact on credit markets and confidence could have the effect of bring on another rate cut next month in Australia next month, says the AMP’s chief economist and strategist, Dr Shane Oliver.He says that with financial turmoil intensifying again, various commentators have been making comparisons to the 1930s, shares have been hitting new bear market lows (Australian shares are now down 34% from last November’s high, US shares down 24% and Asian shares are off 40%) and the global economy looking more and more shaky.”Its easy to get very bearish, with predictions of a long term bear market based on an unwinding of household debt levels and slump in consumer spending made worse by the credit crunch becoming more common.”For some time we have been of the view that shares would remain weak into September/October ahead of better conditions later this year and going into 2009.While the ongoing turmoil in the US financial system indicates that the risks have gone up and that shares may see further downside in the next month or so, our assessment is that a long term bear market in shares is unlikely,” he says.With financial turmoil in the US intensifying again on the back of Lehman Brothers failure and concerns about other companies, claims that the current situation is the worst since the 1930s, shares making new bear market lows and the global economy continuing to deteriorate its easy to get very bearish. In fact there are many who argue shares are now in a long term bear market led by an unravelling of debt, asset prices, consumer spending and profits.This note reviews the main issues and why we think such a long term bear market is unlikely.The long term Bear caseMost predictions of a long term bear market in shares focus on the US. Firstly, it’s argued that shares may not be overvalued relative to the current level of company profits but there has been an unsustainable bubble in profits and if this is adjusted for shares are expensive.One way of doing this, popularised by Robert Shiller in his book Irrational Exuberance, is to compare shares to a trailing ten year average of earnings and when this is done the price to earnings ratio (PE) for US shares is still above its very long term average, and it usually overshoots below its long term average. The next chart shows this for the US.Secondly, it’s claimed by the long term bears that the bubble in profits has been fuelled in large part by a housing bubble in the US and other key countries including Australia which in turn has been underpinned by a massive rise in household debt levels (see the next chart) which has all resulted in a consumer spending spree.Finally, the perma bears argue that thanks to the US subprime crisis and resulting credit crunch the housing bubble is now bursting and this has set off a debt deflation spiral like Japan experienced in the 1990s and the US in the 1930s.This would run something like this: falling house prices result in loss of wealth and reduced consumer spending which results in tougher economic conditions which results in rising mortgage defaults and less demand for houses and reduced bank lending in response to their mortgage losses which results in further falls in house prices and so on.It’s claimed that the US and UK are already embarking along this debt deflation spiral – only made worse by the latest bout of financial market turmoil – and that Australia is just starting.As a result, the long term bears argue that the bear market in shares has only just begun. This all raises several issues.What is an appropriate long term PE?There are several reasons to believe that the appropriate PE has moved up over time.Share markets today are highly liquid, transaction costs are very low and it is easy to set up a diversified portfolio to reduce risk.And the volatility of economic activity and wages has declined dramatically over the last century which should result in a higher level of investor risk tolerance.These considerations suggest investors would be happy to buy shares on a higher PE today than was case in the distant past and as a result the fair value PE today is likely to be higher than it was in 1900 or 1950.If this is the case it would mean that even after smoothing out the surge in profits over the last few years shares are still not expensive.Has there really been a bubble in earnings?There is no doubt that the level of earnings increased at an unsustainable pace in recent years on the back of strong productivity growth, more flexible labour markets and the resources boom in Australia’s case.This has taken margins and profit shares of GDP up to record levels as evident in the chart below for the US and Australia.While its to be expected that the profit share will fall back a bit as is already occurring in the US and that the long term profit growth will slow to a more sustainable pace there is no reason to expect the profit share of GDP to collapse: the sort of wages pressure that result in profit collapses didn’t eventuate through the 2002 to 2007 global economic recovery & look unlikely now economic activity is slowing.What is the risk of a debt deflation spiral?The risk of debt deflation spiral is significant, particularly in the US and UK where house prices are already falling sharply, banks and other financial institutions have sustained big losses with several going bust in the US, bank lending standards have become very tight and may become even tighter as banks’ capital bases continue to come under pressure and the slump in house prices is starting to affect consumer spending.And very poor affordability raises the prospect of something similar in Australia.The intransigence of the European Central Bank which has been raising interest rates despite the sub-prime related credit crunch is also adding to the global risks.However most economic downturns and bear markets go through a period of heightened uncertainty and concerns that the central bank is powerless and is effectively just “pushing on a string” because banks won’t want to or can’t lend and no one will want to borrow. This is a common refrain at some point in most economic downturns and bear markets.And this is pretty much where we are now.More specifically, while there is lots of short term uncertainty and further declines in shares are likely over the next month or so, there are good reasons not to get too bearish:Firstly, the corporate sector in most countries is in good shape and this provides an offset to weakness in the household sector.This is evident in both the US and Australia in the ongoing strength in business investment.Secondly, the US authorities have shown they are prepared to do whatever is necessary to prevent a full-blown debt implosion.They moved very quickly to start cutting interest rates (in fact the Fed started recutting before the US share market peaked in October last year) and provide fiscal stimulus, financial institutions that have run into trouble such as Bear Stearns and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been quickly dealt with and similarly banks in trouble have been taken over by the Federal regulator (12 so far) and their depositors protected. And US banks and investment banks have been quickly dealing with their bad debts.• This is very different to Japan in the 1990s where the Bank of Japan took 18 months after the share market peak to start cutting interest rates, insolvent banks were allowed to linger on, bad debts were not written off until years later and so as a result deflationary forces were able to take hold and this led to an 80% fall in Japanese shares spread over 13 years.• Similarly, the current situation is very different to the US in the 1930s where there was initially a focus on balancing the budget, more than 5000 US banks were allowed to go bust between 1929 and 1933 taking their customers savings with them and in 1931 interest rates were actually increased which all contributed to an 85% fall in US shares over two and a half years.The quick action by US authorities over the last year has been reflected in the fact that the US share market has fallen less (down about 22% from last year’s high) than European, Asian and Australian shares (which are down by more than 30%) so far in the current bear market.Thirdly, the fall in private debt that occurred in the US in the early 1990s in the aftermath of the savings and loan crisis and a commercial property bubble did not prevent economic recovery and a modestly rising share market through most of the period of deleveraging. See the chart below.Finally, it is hard to believe, with consumption being a national past-time, that once interest rates come down sufficiently, Americans and Australians won’t revert to their normal consumption patterns.In this regard, the plunge in the oil price, the ongoing credit crunch and the deteriorating economic outlook will likely see most central banks cut interest rates, including the Fed and the RBA.Concluding commentsFor some time we have been of the view that shares would remain weak into September/October ahead of better conditions later this year and going into 2009. While the ongoing turmoil in the US financial system indicates that the risks have gone up and that shares may see further downside in the next month or so, our assessment is that a long term bear market in shares is unlikely.

IMPORTANT: AIR reports about financial markets and investment products in the widest sense possible. The AIR website and all its contents is prepared for general information only, and as such, the specific needs, investment objectives or financial situation of any particular user have not been taken into consideration. Individuals should therefore talk with their financial planner or advisor before making any investment decisions.

A tale of two big mining industry takeovers: one with a realistic result, the other where fairyland still rules.

The realistic one was Xstrata, the most acquisitive mining group in the world pulling its $US11 billion ($A12.6 billion) bid for Lonmin, the big platinum miner based in South Africa, but headquartered in London.

In Australia, BHP Billiton welcomed the decision by the competition regulator not to block its 3.4 share bid for Rio Tinto, and BHP and Rio shares stormed higher.

A case of desperate investors here not understanding the changes happening overseas, or eternal optimists, led by the BHP board?

Xstrata said it does not intend to make a takeover offer for Lonmin because of “extreme volatility and uncertainty in the financial markets”.

The “lack of clarity and certainty regarding the future availability of credit introduces significant risks” into financing for any bid, Switzerland-based Xstrata said in a statement.

Xstrata is believed to have lined up a $US15 billion (around $A19 billion) loan from a group of banks to finance its proposed 33 pounds ($A73-a-share) offer and refinance existing debt.

Xstrata had to commit to the bid by tonight, our time, or withdraw. It chose the latter staged a very prudent retreat.

After pulling the bid, it snapped up more than 14% of Lonmin for just over 19 pounds a share and now has an all but controlling 33%.

It’s not the only big international bid to have been killed off by the credit crunch and lending freeze.

Last month a private equity group called off a $A4.2 billion offer for UK events publisher, Informa and HSBC bailed out of a year-long effort to buy 51% of the Korean Exchange Bank for $A8 billion after failing to get the deal finalised and with worries about the global outlook.

Xstrata had built up a 10.7% in Lonmin, but refused to buy any more, even as its target share price sank under the proposed offer price, a good sign of the concern Xstrata was having about the outlook for finance and for commodities.

It snapped up the extra shares after the bid was withdrawn and Lonmin’s price fell.

Despite that Xstrata’s price fell 1.9% in London by the close.

Lonmin replaced its CEO on Monday without warning. Ian Farmer, formerly the chief strategic officer is the new boss and he will drive the company’s review of its existing operations and performance.

Bloomberg estimates that Xstrata has spent about $US28 billion in four years on acquisitions, boosting sales eightfold. It has also ended attempted transactions. The company broke off talks to buy Brazil’s CVRD (Vale), the world’s biggest iron-ore exporter, in April. Xstrata also terminated moves to buy Australia’s WMC Resources in 2005 and Canada’s LionOre Mining International last year after higher bids from rivals.

In Australia, the market was dragged higher by the news that the ACCC would not oppose the proposed BHP Billiton bid for rival Rio Tinto.

Rio shares surged, up $A10.50, or 12.43%, at $95.00, after hitting a high of $98.60. BHP Billiton shares were up $A1.75 or 5.6% at $32.75, after hitting a high of $33.40. The 3.4 BHP shares for every 1 Rio share offer was worth $111.35, a still substantial premium to the actual Rio price and a sign of continuing market scepticism.But BHP shares tumbled 4% in London on the Xstrata news and the worsening outlook for commodities and the global economy.

The ACCC noted that its review of the planned merger had raised “significant concerns”.

“While significant concerns were raised by interested parties in Australia and overseas, the ACCC found that the proposed acquisition would not be likely to substantially lessen competition in any relevant market,” chairman Graeme Samuel said in a statement.

BHP said in a statement:”BHP Billiton today welcomed the decision by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission that it does not object to BHP Billiton’s proposed acquisition of Rio Tinto.”We are very pleased to have received notice that the ACCC will not object to our proposed acquisition of Rio Tinto.

“We have long believed in the benefits of the combination of BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto. Our strategic rationale has always been based on the combined company having an incentive to produce more products, more quickly, to deliver to customers.” BHP Billiton’s Chief Commercial Officer, Alberto Calderon, said.

“Confirmation that the ACCC does not object satisfies the Australian merger control pre-condition of BHP Billiton’s proposed offer for Rio Tinto. In July, the U.S. Department of Justice also announced it would not oppose the transaction. The offer remains subject to the pre-conditions as disclosed in Appendix 1 of the announcement on 6 February 2008.”

The ACCC said in August that market inquiries had raised concerns the merged entity might lessen competition for iron ore and drive up prices of the valuable commodity.

Rio Tinto is the world’s second biggest producer of iron ore, while BHP Billiton is the third largest.

“The ACCC’s inquiries indicated that the merged firm would be unlikely to limit its supply of iron ore given the uncertainty it would face in relation to the profitability of this strategy and the risk that limiting supply would encourage expansions by existing and new suppliers as well sponsorship of alternative suppliers by steel makers,” Mr Samuel said.

Strong opposition to the merger has emerged from steel makers in Asia and Europe amid concerns a combined entity could have enormous control over global iron ore and other resource commodity prices.

“In relation to the supply of iron ore in Australia, market inquiries indicated that steel makers in Australia are unlikely to face higher iron ore lump and iron ore fines prices, based on a move from export parity pricing to import parity pricing,” Mr Samuel said.

The European Commission, the EU’s antitrust regulator, resumed its assessment of the proposal late last month after suspending its investigation in August, to await further information from BHP Billiton.

The commission is expected to rule on the proposed transaction on January 15, 2009.

That is likely to be the deciding factor in whether the bid goes ahead.

BHP says it has a “committed banking financing facility” from a group of banks lead by Barclays Capital, BNP Paribas, Citigroup Global Markets, Goldman Sachs International, HSBC, Banco Santander and UBS.

UBS is a basket case, Santander is bedding down Alliance and Leicester and the parts of Bradford and Bingley it bought at the weekend, Citigroup is coping with taking over Wachovia in the US, Barclays Capital is swallowing most of the US business of Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs is coping with being a fully regulated bank and not an investment bank.

And on top of that, there’s hardly any lending going on and won’t be in the New Year if the bid gets the big tick and happens.

IMPORTANT: AIR reports about financial markets and investment products in the widest sense possible. The AIR website and all its contents is prepared for general information only, and as such, the specific needs, investment objectives or financial situation of any particular user have not been taken into consideration. Individuals should therefore talk with their financial planner or advisor before making any investment decisions.

A tale of two big mining industry takeovers: one with a realistic result, the other where fairyland still rules.

The realistic one was Xstrata, the most acquisitive mining group in the world pulling its $US11 billion ($A12.6 billion) bid for Lonmin, the big platinum miner based in South Africa, but headquartered in London.

In Australia, BHP Billiton welcomed the decision by the competition regulator not to block its 3.4 share bid for Rio Tinto, and BHP and Rio shares stormed higher.

A case of desperate investors here not understanding the changes happening overseas, or eternal optimists, led by the BHP board?

Xstrata said it does not intend to make a takeover offer for Lonmin because of “extreme volatility and uncertainty in the financial markets”.

The “lack of clarity and certainty regarding the future availability of credit introduces significant risks” into financing for any bid, Switzerland-based Xstrata said in a statement.

Xstrata is believed to have lined up a $US15 billion (around $A19 billion) loan from a group of banks to finance its proposed 33 pounds ($A73-a-share) offer and refinance existing debt.

Xstrata had to commit to the bid by tonight, our time, or withdraw. It chose the latter staged a very prudent retreat.

After pulling the bid, it snapped up more than 14% of Lonmin for just over 19 pounds a share and now has an all but controlling 33%.

It’s not the only big international bid to have been killed off by the credit crunch and lending freeze.

Last month a private equity group called off a $A4.2 billion offer for UK events publisher, Informa and HSBC bailed out of a year-long effort to buy 51% of the Korean Exchange Bank for $A8 billion after failing to get the deal finalised and with worries about the global outlook.

Xstrata had built up a 10.7% in Lonmin, but refused to buy any more, even as its target share price sank under the proposed offer price, a good sign of the concern Xstrata was having about the outlook for finance and for commodities.

It snapped up the extra shares after the bid was withdrawn and Lonmin’s price fell.

Despite that Xstrata’s price fell 1.9% in London by the close.

Lonmin replaced its CEO on Monday without warning. Ian Farmer, formerly the chief strategic officer is the new boss and he will drive the company’s review of its existing operations and performance.

Bloomberg estimates that Xstrata has spent about $US28 billion in four years on acquisitions, boosting sales eightfold. It has also ended attempted transactions. The company broke off talks to buy Brazil’s CVRD (Vale), the world’s biggest iron-ore exporter, in April. Xstrata also terminated moves to buy Australia’s WMC Resources in 2005 and Canada’s LionOre Mining International last year after higher bids from rivals.

In Australia, the market was dragged higher by the news that the ACCC would not oppose the proposed BHP Billiton bid for rival Rio Tinto.

Rio shares surged, up $A10.50, or 12.43%, at $95.00, after hitting a high of $98.60. BHP Billiton shares were up $A1.75 or 5.6% at $32.75, after hitting a high of $33.40. The 3.4 BHP shares for every 1 Rio share offer was worth $111.35, a still substantial premium to the actual Rio price and a sign of continuing market scepticism.But BHP shares tumbled 4% in London on the Xstrata news and the worsening outlook for commodities and the global economy.

The ACCC noted that its review of the planned merger had raised “significant concerns”.

“While significant concerns were raised by interested parties in Australia and overseas, the ACCC found that the proposed acquisition would not be likely to substantially lessen competition in any relevant market,” chairman Graeme Samuel said in a statement.

BHP said in a statement:”BHP Billiton today welcomed the decision by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission that it does not object to BHP Billiton’s proposed acquisition of Rio Tinto.”We are very pleased to have received notice that the ACCC will not object to our proposed acquisition of Rio Tinto.

“We have long believed in the benefits of the combination of BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto. Our strategic rationale has always been based on the combined company having an incentive to produce more products, more quickly, to deliver to customers.” BHP Billiton’s Chief Commercial Officer, Alberto Calderon, said.

“Confirmation that the ACCC does not object satisfies the Australian merger control pre-condition of BHP Billiton’s proposed offer for Rio Tinto. In July, the U.S. Department of Justice also announced it would not oppose the transaction. The offer remains subject to the pre-conditions as disclosed in Appendix 1 of the announcement on 6 February 2008.”

The ACCC said in August that market inquiries had raised concerns the merged entity might lessen competition for iron ore and drive up prices of the valuable commodity.

Rio Tinto is the world’s second biggest producer of iron ore, while BHP Billiton is the third largest.

“The ACCC’s inquiries indicated that the merged firm would be unlikely to limit its supply of iron ore given the uncertainty it would face in relation to the profitability of this strategy and the risk that limiting supply would encourage expansions by existing and new suppliers as well sponsorship of alternative suppliers by steel makers,” Mr Samuel said.

Strong opposition to the merger has emerged from steel makers in Asia and Europe amid concerns a combined entity could have enormous control over global iron ore and other resource commodity prices.

“In relation to the supply of iron ore in Australia, market inquiries indicated that steel makers in Australia are unlikely to face higher iron ore lump and iron ore fines prices, based on a move from export parity pricing to import parity pricing,” Mr Samuel said.

The European Commission, the EU’s antitrust regulator, resumed its assessment of the proposal late last month after suspending its investigation in August, to await further information from BHP Billiton.

The commission is expected to rule on the proposed transaction on January 15, 2009.

That is likely to be the deciding factor in whether the bid goes ahead.

BHP says it has a “committed banking financing facility” from a group of banks lead by Barclays Capital, BNP Paribas, Citigroup Global Markets, Goldman Sachs International, HSBC, Banco Santander and UBS.

UBS is a basket case, Santander is bedding down Alliance and Leicester and the parts of Bradford and Bingley it bought at the weekend, Citigroup is coping with taking over Wachovia in the US, Barclays Capital is swallowing most of the US business of Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs is coping with being a fully regulated bank and not an investment bank.

And on top of that, there’s hardly any lending going on and won’t be in the New Year if the bid gets the big tick and happens.

IMPORTANT: AIR reports about financial markets and investment products in the widest sense possible. The AIR website and all its contents is prepared for general information only, and as such, the specific needs, investment objectives or financial situation of any particular user have not been taken into consideration. Individuals should therefore talk with their financial planner or advisor before making any investment decisions.