Markets: We Ban Shorting, Will There be a Bounce?

Uncategorized No Comments »

There’s nothing more to be said about the markets last week except that we all survived, battered, bruised, shell shocked and worse if you were shareholders in some American companies no longer with us like Lehman Bros, Merrill Lynch, AIG, Macquarie, HBOS and a host of other financial stocks.This week events will be dominated by the shape of the rescue body announced Friday to bailout the dodgy securities.Here in Australia we have banned all short selling, not just the naughty naked kind, in a new development revealed last night by the financial regulator, ASIC. It starts from today and continues until further notice.It is a step up of the ban on naked shorting announced Friday.But the big issue is the $US700 billion bailout fund which is likely to provide an opportunity for ambitious and idiotic US congress representatives to try and add pet deals of their own to the bill.Markets around the world simply love the idea, but that affection will be hard to hold as the fund takes ages to have any lasting impact.The Standard & Poor’s 500 dropped by more than 4.7% twice last week after Lehman Brothers’ collapse; Bank of America Corp’s takeover of Merrill Lynch and the US government’s seizure of American International Group.But the S&P 500 ended the week by jumping 8.5% on Thursday and Friday on the US government’s plan to purge banks of bad assets, crack down on short sellers and to stand behind money market funds through support from the Federal Reserve.Shanghai surged 9.5%, in the biggest daily gain for seven years, to 2,075.091.Hong Kong’s Hang Sang gained 9.6% to 19,327.73, London’s FTSE 100 had its biggest daily gain in its 24-year history, jumping 8.8% and in Australia the ASX 200 was up 198 points or more than 4.2% on Friday.It was the biggest two-day global stocks rally in 38 years. Friday’s rallies in London and the US were partially fuelled by bans on short-selling in financial stocks announced on Thursday night.Besides the S&P 500’s gains the Dow added 929 points from Thursday’s low and markets from the UK, China, and Australia and elsewhere surged as investors appreciated the fact that the great panic had been halted for the time being.But it is short term, even the new fund being set up to help buy the so-called toxic securities by the US Treasury.The longer term issues will be the newly increased size of the US deficit and debt, the impact of this huge expansion of money supply on inflation, and most of all the slumping US economy and the disaster that is the US housing sector.The S&P 500 ended up 48.57 points to 1,255.08 on Friday, the Dow surged 368.75, or 3.4%, to 11,388.44 and Nada rose 74.8, or 3.4%, to 2,273.9.The MSCI World Index of 23 developed nations’ markets jumped 5.7% to 1,286.44 on Friday and rose 8% over Thursday and Friday. Europe’s main regional index (the Sox 600) rose a record 8.3% Friday and the MSCI Asia Pacific Index added 5.5% Friday.The S&P 500 actually erased its fall to close up 0.3% for the week, but it is still down down 15% this year.Market reports said a record 3 billion shares were traded on the NYSE on Friday: that was more than double the three-month daily average.Under pressure investment banks, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley saw their shares leap more than 20% on Friday as shorts scrambled to cover themselves.Traders said that only consumer staples, the best performing group this year, fell led by Wal-Mart, the world’s largest retailer.Its shares fell almost 3% for the biggest decline in the Dow.That reaction has a touch of unreality because it won’t be too long before investors start worrying about the economy and banks again and go back into consumer staples.US and European government bonds tumbled; reversing gains made earlier in the week as investor sold equities and commodities and moved into bonds as quickly as possible.The proposal from Paulson and Bernanke (and strongly supported by president Bush over the weekend) is aimed at isolating devalued mortgage-linked assets at the root of the worst credit crisis since the Great Depression.US Congressional leaders said they aim to pass legislation soon, but some have started wondering about loans to US car companies like General Motors and a $US50 billion stimulatory package to follow the $US120 billion tax rebate which came and went from May to July of this year.That sort of grandstanding is going to be dangerous, and expensive.In Australia the major banks led the surge on Friday and today the market is forecast to be up by around 130 points, if Saturday morning’s overnight futures finish is any guide.The ASX200 index finished up 196.8 points, or 4.27%, to 4804.1, while the All Ordinaries index ended up 188.8 points, or 4.06%, to 4840.7.The National Australia Bank soared $3.40, or 17.35%, to $23.00; the Commonwealth jumped $2.62, or 6.54%, to $42.70; the ANZ rose $2.26, or 14.63%, to $17.71; and Westpac ended up $1.54, or 7%, at $23.54.But the focus was on Macquarie Group: after being belted up to the close Thursday, it rocketed $9.85, or 37.81%, to $35.90 after touching an intraday high of $38.55 just before noon.Suncor Metway leapt 75c to $9.10 as the company completed the underwriting on its dividend reinvestment plan two weeks early.In resources BHP Billiton ended up 40c at $35.40 and Rio Tinto jumped $3.10 to $101.50.Iron ore miner Fortescue Metals Group added 50c to $5.70 despite reporting an annual bottom-line net loss of $2.8 billion and saying it would not provide a forecast for the current year because it may prejudice “the interests of the company”.Oil and gas producer Woodside Petroleum was up $2.66 at $54.06, and Santos 53c to $18.28.Newmont dropped 55c to $4.92 and gold fell; Newcrest eased 65c to $23.85 and Lehar dropped 3c to $2.45.The Australian dollar finished higher in New York at 83.40, US cents after the US dollar lost ground as nervy investors sold the currency.Earlier, the Aussie had finished around 81.15 on Friday, up about 1.3 US from Thursday’s close of 79.88. That’s up 3.5c in two days, or almost 5%.And naked short selling will be banned on the Australian Stock Exchange from today.But in a dramatic decision the regulator, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission has banned ALL short selling for a month from today, not just the naked variety. ASIC said the widened ban would act as a circuit breaker to restore investor confidence.Short selling, where traders seek to profit by selling borrowed shares of companies to then buy them back, in the anticipation their prices will drop, has been partly blamed for the sharp falls of stocks such as Macquarie Group in recent days.Naked short selling, involves selling without first borrowing the stock, or even ensuring the shares can be borrowed.The Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) said on Friday it would remove all securities from its list of stocks approved for naked short selling from Monday.The ASX said the “The removal will remain in force until further notice.”"It will be reviewed when the government’s foreshadowed legislative amendments to the reporting of covered short selling activity take effect.”But last night the ASX ban was supplanted by the wider ban from ASIC.ASIC chairman, Tony D’Aloisio, said “To limit the prohibition to financial stocks, as has been done in the UK, could subject our other stocks to unwarranted attack given the unknown amount of global money which may be looking for short sell plays.”

IMPORTANT: AIR reports about financial markets and investment products in the widest sense possible. The AIR website and all its contents is prepared for general information only, and as such, the specific needs, investment objectives or financial situation of any particular user have not been taken into consideration. Individuals should therefore talk with their financial planner or advisor before making any investment decisions.

Bear Market Looms?

Uncategorized No Comments »

If anything, the current turmoil and its impact on credit markets and confidence could have the effect of bring on another rate cut next month in Australia next month, says the AMP’s chief economist and strategist, Dr Shane Oliver.He says that with financial turmoil intensifying again, various commentators have been making comparisons to the 1930s, shares have been hitting new bear market lows (Australian shares are now down 34% from last November’s high, US shares down 24% and Asian shares are off 40%) and the global economy looking more and more shaky.”Its easy to get very bearish, with predictions of a long term bear market based on an unwinding of household debt levels and slump in consumer spending made worse by the credit crunch becoming more common.”For some time we have been of the view that shares would remain weak into September/October ahead of better conditions later this year and going into 2009.While the ongoing turmoil in the US financial system indicates that the risks have gone up and that shares may see further downside in the next month or so, our assessment is that a long term bear market in shares is unlikely,” he says.With financial turmoil in the US intensifying again on the back of Lehman Brothers failure and concerns about other companies, claims that the current situation is the worst since the 1930s, shares making new bear market lows and the global economy continuing to deteriorate its easy to get very bearish. In fact there are many who argue shares are now in a long term bear market led by an unravelling of debt, asset prices, consumer spending and profits.This note reviews the main issues and why we think such a long term bear market is unlikely.The long term Bear caseMost predictions of a long term bear market in shares focus on the US. Firstly, it’s argued that shares may not be overvalued relative to the current level of company profits but there has been an unsustainable bubble in profits and if this is adjusted for shares are expensive.One way of doing this, popularised by Robert Shiller in his book Irrational Exuberance, is to compare shares to a trailing ten year average of earnings and when this is done the price to earnings ratio (PE) for US shares is still above its very long term average, and it usually overshoots below its long term average. The next chart shows this for the US.Secondly, it’s claimed by the long term bears that the bubble in profits has been fuelled in large part by a housing bubble in the US and other key countries including Australia which in turn has been underpinned by a massive rise in household debt levels (see the next chart) which has all resulted in a consumer spending spree.Finally, the perma bears argue that thanks to the US subprime crisis and resulting credit crunch the housing bubble is now bursting and this has set off a debt deflation spiral like Japan experienced in the 1990s and the US in the 1930s.This would run something like this: falling house prices result in loss of wealth and reduced consumer spending which results in tougher economic conditions which results in rising mortgage defaults and less demand for houses and reduced bank lending in response to their mortgage losses which results in further falls in house prices and so on.It’s claimed that the US and UK are already embarking along this debt deflation spiral – only made worse by the latest bout of financial market turmoil – and that Australia is just starting.As a result, the long term bears argue that the bear market in shares has only just begun. This all raises several issues.What is an appropriate long term PE?There are several reasons to believe that the appropriate PE has moved up over time.Share markets today are highly liquid, transaction costs are very low and it is easy to set up a diversified portfolio to reduce risk.And the volatility of economic activity and wages has declined dramatically over the last century which should result in a higher level of investor risk tolerance.These considerations suggest investors would be happy to buy shares on a higher PE today than was case in the distant past and as a result the fair value PE today is likely to be higher than it was in 1900 or 1950.If this is the case it would mean that even after smoothing out the surge in profits over the last few years shares are still not expensive.Has there really been a bubble in earnings?There is no doubt that the level of earnings increased at an unsustainable pace in recent years on the back of strong productivity growth, more flexible labour markets and the resources boom in Australia’s case.This has taken margins and profit shares of GDP up to record levels as evident in the chart below for the US and Australia.While its to be expected that the profit share will fall back a bit as is already occurring in the US and that the long term profit growth will slow to a more sustainable pace there is no reason to expect the profit share of GDP to collapse: the sort of wages pressure that result in profit collapses didn’t eventuate through the 2002 to 2007 global economic recovery & look unlikely now economic activity is slowing.What is the risk of a debt deflation spiral?The risk of debt deflation spiral is significant, particularly in the US and UK where house prices are already falling sharply, banks and other financial institutions have sustained big losses with several going bust in the US, bank lending standards have become very tight and may become even tighter as banks’ capital bases continue to come under pressure and the slump in house prices is starting to affect consumer spending.And very poor affordability raises the prospect of something similar in Australia.The intransigence of the European Central Bank which has been raising interest rates despite the sub-prime related credit crunch is also adding to the global risks.However most economic downturns and bear markets go through a period of heightened uncertainty and concerns that the central bank is powerless and is effectively just “pushing on a string” because banks won’t want to or can’t lend and no one will want to borrow. This is a common refrain at some point in most economic downturns and bear markets.And this is pretty much where we are now.More specifically, while there is lots of short term uncertainty and further declines in shares are likely over the next month or so, there are good reasons not to get too bearish:Firstly, the corporate sector in most countries is in good shape and this provides an offset to weakness in the household sector.This is evident in both the US and Australia in the ongoing strength in business investment.Secondly, the US authorities have shown they are prepared to do whatever is necessary to prevent a full-blown debt implosion.They moved very quickly to start cutting interest rates (in fact the Fed started recutting before the US share market peaked in October last year) and provide fiscal stimulus, financial institutions that have run into trouble such as Bear Stearns and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been quickly dealt with and similarly banks in trouble have been taken over by the Federal regulator (12 so far) and their depositors protected. And US banks and investment banks have been quickly dealing with their bad debts.• This is very different to Japan in the 1990s where the Bank of Japan took 18 months after the share market peak to start cutting interest rates, insolvent banks were allowed to linger on, bad debts were not written off until years later and so as a result deflationary forces were able to take hold and this led to an 80% fall in Japanese shares spread over 13 years.• Similarly, the current situation is very different to the US in the 1930s where there was initially a focus on balancing the budget, more than 5000 US banks were allowed to go bust between 1929 and 1933 taking their customers savings with them and in 1931 interest rates were actually increased which all contributed to an 85% fall in US shares over two and a half years.The quick action by US authorities over the last year has been reflected in the fact that the US share market has fallen less (down about 22% from last year’s high) than European, Asian and Australian shares (which are down by more than 30%) so far in the current bear market.Thirdly, the fall in private debt that occurred in the US in the early 1990s in the aftermath of the savings and loan crisis and a commercial property bubble did not prevent economic recovery and a modestly rising share market through most of the period of deleveraging. See the chart below.Finally, it is hard to believe, with consumption being a national past-time, that once interest rates come down sufficiently, Americans and Australians won’t revert to their normal consumption patterns.In this regard, the plunge in the oil price, the ongoing credit crunch and the deteriorating economic outlook will likely see most central banks cut interest rates, including the Fed and the RBA.Concluding commentsFor some time we have been of the view that shares would remain weak into September/October ahead of better conditions later this year and going into 2009. While the ongoing turmoil in the US financial system indicates that the risks have gone up and that shares may see further downside in the next month or so, our assessment is that a long term bear market in shares is unlikely.

IMPORTANT: AIR reports about financial markets and investment products in the widest sense possible. The AIR website and all its contents is prepared for general information only, and as such, the specific needs, investment objectives or financial situation of any particular user have not been taken into consideration. Individuals should therefore talk with their financial planner or advisor before making any investment decisions.

A Tale of Two Bidders: Bhp & Xstrata

Uncategorized No Comments »

A tale of two big mining industry takeovers: one with a realistic result, the other where fairyland still rules.

The realistic one was Xstrata, the most acquisitive mining group in the world pulling its $US11 billion ($A12.6 billion) bid for Lonmin, the big platinum miner based in South Africa, but headquartered in London.

In Australia, BHP Billiton welcomed the decision by the competition regulator not to block its 3.4 share bid for Rio Tinto, and BHP and Rio shares stormed higher.

A case of desperate investors here not understanding the changes happening overseas, or eternal optimists, led by the BHP board?

Xstrata said it does not intend to make a takeover offer for Lonmin because of “extreme volatility and uncertainty in the financial markets”.

The “lack of clarity and certainty regarding the future availability of credit introduces significant risks” into financing for any bid, Switzerland-based Xstrata said in a statement.

Xstrata is believed to have lined up a $US15 billion (around $A19 billion) loan from a group of banks to finance its proposed 33 pounds ($A73-a-share) offer and refinance existing debt.

Xstrata had to commit to the bid by tonight, our time, or withdraw. It chose the latter staged a very prudent retreat.

After pulling the bid, it snapped up more than 14% of Lonmin for just over 19 pounds a share and now has an all but controlling 33%.

It’s not the only big international bid to have been killed off by the credit crunch and lending freeze.

Last month a private equity group called off a $A4.2 billion offer for UK events publisher, Informa and HSBC bailed out of a year-long effort to buy 51% of the Korean Exchange Bank for $A8 billion after failing to get the deal finalised and with worries about the global outlook.

Xstrata had built up a 10.7% in Lonmin, but refused to buy any more, even as its target share price sank under the proposed offer price, a good sign of the concern Xstrata was having about the outlook for finance and for commodities.

It snapped up the extra shares after the bid was withdrawn and Lonmin’s price fell.

Despite that Xstrata’s price fell 1.9% in London by the close.

Lonmin replaced its CEO on Monday without warning. Ian Farmer, formerly the chief strategic officer is the new boss and he will drive the company’s review of its existing operations and performance.

Bloomberg estimates that Xstrata has spent about $US28 billion in four years on acquisitions, boosting sales eightfold. It has also ended attempted transactions. The company broke off talks to buy Brazil’s CVRD (Vale), the world’s biggest iron-ore exporter, in April. Xstrata also terminated moves to buy Australia’s WMC Resources in 2005 and Canada’s LionOre Mining International last year after higher bids from rivals.

In Australia, the market was dragged higher by the news that the ACCC would not oppose the proposed BHP Billiton bid for rival Rio Tinto.

Rio shares surged, up $A10.50, or 12.43%, at $95.00, after hitting a high of $98.60. BHP Billiton shares were up $A1.75 or 5.6% at $32.75, after hitting a high of $33.40. The 3.4 BHP shares for every 1 Rio share offer was worth $111.35, a still substantial premium to the actual Rio price and a sign of continuing market scepticism.But BHP shares tumbled 4% in London on the Xstrata news and the worsening outlook for commodities and the global economy.

The ACCC noted that its review of the planned merger had raised “significant concerns”.

“While significant concerns were raised by interested parties in Australia and overseas, the ACCC found that the proposed acquisition would not be likely to substantially lessen competition in any relevant market,” chairman Graeme Samuel said in a statement.

BHP said in a statement:”BHP Billiton today welcomed the decision by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission that it does not object to BHP Billiton’s proposed acquisition of Rio Tinto.”We are very pleased to have received notice that the ACCC will not object to our proposed acquisition of Rio Tinto.

“We have long believed in the benefits of the combination of BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto. Our strategic rationale has always been based on the combined company having an incentive to produce more products, more quickly, to deliver to customers.” BHP Billiton’s Chief Commercial Officer, Alberto Calderon, said.

“Confirmation that the ACCC does not object satisfies the Australian merger control pre-condition of BHP Billiton’s proposed offer for Rio Tinto. In July, the U.S. Department of Justice also announced it would not oppose the transaction. The offer remains subject to the pre-conditions as disclosed in Appendix 1 of the announcement on 6 February 2008.”

The ACCC said in August that market inquiries had raised concerns the merged entity might lessen competition for iron ore and drive up prices of the valuable commodity.

Rio Tinto is the world’s second biggest producer of iron ore, while BHP Billiton is the third largest.

“The ACCC’s inquiries indicated that the merged firm would be unlikely to limit its supply of iron ore given the uncertainty it would face in relation to the profitability of this strategy and the risk that limiting supply would encourage expansions by existing and new suppliers as well sponsorship of alternative suppliers by steel makers,” Mr Samuel said.

Strong opposition to the merger has emerged from steel makers in Asia and Europe amid concerns a combined entity could have enormous control over global iron ore and other resource commodity prices.

“In relation to the supply of iron ore in Australia, market inquiries indicated that steel makers in Australia are unlikely to face higher iron ore lump and iron ore fines prices, based on a move from export parity pricing to import parity pricing,” Mr Samuel said.

The European Commission, the EU’s antitrust regulator, resumed its assessment of the proposal late last month after suspending its investigation in August, to await further information from BHP Billiton.

The commission is expected to rule on the proposed transaction on January 15, 2009.

That is likely to be the deciding factor in whether the bid goes ahead.

BHP says it has a “committed banking financing facility” from a group of banks lead by Barclays Capital, BNP Paribas, Citigroup Global Markets, Goldman Sachs International, HSBC, Banco Santander and UBS.

UBS is a basket case, Santander is bedding down Alliance and Leicester and the parts of Bradford and Bingley it bought at the weekend, Citigroup is coping with taking over Wachovia in the US, Barclays Capital is swallowing most of the US business of Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs is coping with being a fully regulated bank and not an investment bank.

And on top of that, there’s hardly any lending going on and won’t be in the New Year if the bid gets the big tick and happens.

IMPORTANT: AIR reports about financial markets and investment products in the widest sense possible. The AIR website and all its contents is prepared for general information only, and as such, the specific needs, investment objectives or financial situation of any particular user have not been taken into consideration. Individuals should therefore talk with their financial planner or advisor before making any investment decisions.

 

 

A Tale of Two Bidders: Bhp & Xstrata

Uncategorized No Comments »

A tale of two big mining industry takeovers: one with a realistic result, the other where fairyland still rules.

The realistic one was Xstrata, the most acquisitive mining group in the world pulling its $US11 billion ($A12.6 billion) bid for Lonmin, the big platinum miner based in South Africa, but headquartered in London.

In Australia, BHP Billiton welcomed the decision by the competition regulator not to block its 3.4 share bid for Rio Tinto, and BHP and Rio shares stormed higher.

A case of desperate investors here not understanding the changes happening overseas, or eternal optimists, led by the BHP board?

Xstrata said it does not intend to make a takeover offer for Lonmin because of “extreme volatility and uncertainty in the financial markets”.

The “lack of clarity and certainty regarding the future availability of credit introduces significant risks” into financing for any bid, Switzerland-based Xstrata said in a statement.

Xstrata is believed to have lined up a $US15 billion (around $A19 billion) loan from a group of banks to finance its proposed 33 pounds ($A73-a-share) offer and refinance existing debt.

Xstrata had to commit to the bid by tonight, our time, or withdraw. It chose the latter staged a very prudent retreat.

After pulling the bid, it snapped up more than 14% of Lonmin for just over 19 pounds a share and now has an all but controlling 33%.

It’s not the only big international bid to have been killed off by the credit crunch and lending freeze.

Last month a private equity group called off a $A4.2 billion offer for UK events publisher, Informa and HSBC bailed out of a year-long effort to buy 51% of the Korean Exchange Bank for $A8 billion after failing to get the deal finalised and with worries about the global outlook.

Xstrata had built up a 10.7% in Lonmin, but refused to buy any more, even as its target share price sank under the proposed offer price, a good sign of the concern Xstrata was having about the outlook for finance and for commodities.

It snapped up the extra shares after the bid was withdrawn and Lonmin’s price fell.

Despite that Xstrata’s price fell 1.9% in London by the close.

Lonmin replaced its CEO on Monday without warning. Ian Farmer, formerly the chief strategic officer is the new boss and he will drive the company’s review of its existing operations and performance.

Bloomberg estimates that Xstrata has spent about $US28 billion in four years on acquisitions, boosting sales eightfold. It has also ended attempted transactions. The company broke off talks to buy Brazil’s CVRD (Vale), the world’s biggest iron-ore exporter, in April. Xstrata also terminated moves to buy Australia’s WMC Resources in 2005 and Canada’s LionOre Mining International last year after higher bids from rivals.

In Australia, the market was dragged higher by the news that the ACCC would not oppose the proposed BHP Billiton bid for rival Rio Tinto.

Rio shares surged, up $A10.50, or 12.43%, at $95.00, after hitting a high of $98.60. BHP Billiton shares were up $A1.75 or 5.6% at $32.75, after hitting a high of $33.40. The 3.4 BHP shares for every 1 Rio share offer was worth $111.35, a still substantial premium to the actual Rio price and a sign of continuing market scepticism.But BHP shares tumbled 4% in London on the Xstrata news and the worsening outlook for commodities and the global economy.

The ACCC noted that its review of the planned merger had raised “significant concerns”.

“While significant concerns were raised by interested parties in Australia and overseas, the ACCC found that the proposed acquisition would not be likely to substantially lessen competition in any relevant market,” chairman Graeme Samuel said in a statement.

BHP said in a statement:”BHP Billiton today welcomed the decision by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission that it does not object to BHP Billiton’s proposed acquisition of Rio Tinto.”We are very pleased to have received notice that the ACCC will not object to our proposed acquisition of Rio Tinto.

“We have long believed in the benefits of the combination of BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto. Our strategic rationale has always been based on the combined company having an incentive to produce more products, more quickly, to deliver to customers.” BHP Billiton’s Chief Commercial Officer, Alberto Calderon, said.

“Confirmation that the ACCC does not object satisfies the Australian merger control pre-condition of BHP Billiton’s proposed offer for Rio Tinto. In July, the U.S. Department of Justice also announced it would not oppose the transaction. The offer remains subject to the pre-conditions as disclosed in Appendix 1 of the announcement on 6 February 2008.”

The ACCC said in August that market inquiries had raised concerns the merged entity might lessen competition for iron ore and drive up prices of the valuable commodity.

Rio Tinto is the world’s second biggest producer of iron ore, while BHP Billiton is the third largest.

“The ACCC’s inquiries indicated that the merged firm would be unlikely to limit its supply of iron ore given the uncertainty it would face in relation to the profitability of this strategy and the risk that limiting supply would encourage expansions by existing and new suppliers as well sponsorship of alternative suppliers by steel makers,” Mr Samuel said.

Strong opposition to the merger has emerged from steel makers in Asia and Europe amid concerns a combined entity could have enormous control over global iron ore and other resource commodity prices.

“In relation to the supply of iron ore in Australia, market inquiries indicated that steel makers in Australia are unlikely to face higher iron ore lump and iron ore fines prices, based on a move from export parity pricing to import parity pricing,” Mr Samuel said.

The European Commission, the EU’s antitrust regulator, resumed its assessment of the proposal late last month after suspending its investigation in August, to await further information from BHP Billiton.

The commission is expected to rule on the proposed transaction on January 15, 2009.

That is likely to be the deciding factor in whether the bid goes ahead.

BHP says it has a “committed banking financing facility” from a group of banks lead by Barclays Capital, BNP Paribas, Citigroup Global Markets, Goldman Sachs International, HSBC, Banco Santander and UBS.

UBS is a basket case, Santander is bedding down Alliance and Leicester and the parts of Bradford and Bingley it bought at the weekend, Citigroup is coping with taking over Wachovia in the US, Barclays Capital is swallowing most of the US business of Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs is coping with being a fully regulated bank and not an investment bank.

And on top of that, there’s hardly any lending going on and won’t be in the New Year if the bid gets the big tick and happens.

IMPORTANT: AIR reports about financial markets and investment products in the widest sense possible. The AIR website and all its contents is prepared for general information only, and as such, the specific needs, investment objectives or financial situation of any particular user have not been taken into consideration. Individuals should therefore talk with their financial planner or advisor before making any investment decisions.

 

 

Recession on the Doorstep, Knocking

Uncategorized No Comments »

Guess what?

That heavy thump you heard from stockmarkets around the world, especially in the US with the 9% fall in the Standard & Poor’s 500 index on Wednesday, was the sound of the last rose coloured glasses falling from the noses of investors, commentators and investment analysts who have finally accepted that the globe is heaving into a recession, led by the tottering US, UK and European economies.After falling Wednesday, European markets again fell heavily Thursday, but the selling wave in the US slowed as investors accepted the new reality. In fact Wall Street bounced strongly in late trading.

Resources were heavily hit as big investors abandoned their last defensive position.

Wednesday and Thursday saw a collection of figures, reports and comments that confirmed that the global economy will drop below the International Monetary Fund’s idea of a global recession in 2009: that’s global growth of 3%.

It is now clear that the US economy is sliding, nastily, but speedily into a slump the like of which we haven’t seen this side of World War 2. US consumers, who carry the US economy on their backs by generating 70% of annual activity, are being battered into submission.

Consumer spending, consumer credit and retail sales are all falling at levels not seen for decades. There is every chance that October’s and November will see declines even sharper than we have seen in August and September.

The monthly investment manager’s survey from Merrill Lynch, released overnight, says “Investors are waiting for the right conditions to return to equity markets amid the most pessimistic outlook yet recorded”

The survey, completed as global equity markets fell in value by 18.7%, shows that almost seven out of 10 respondents (69%) believe that the global economy has entered recession, up sharply from 44% one month ago.

Growing risk aversion has led to a record 49% of respondents who are overweight cash.

The number of respondents who believe equities are undervalued has reached a 10-year high, at 43%.

“Fund managers are waiting for the triggers that will give them the confidence to buy,” said Gary Baker, head of equity strategy at Merrill Lynch.

What they are looking for is a loosening of monetary conditions and for third quarter earnings to clarify where problems and opportunities lie across equity markets.”

But the survey showed that respondents appear to be placing little or no credibility in consensus earnings estimates for the year ahead. A net 92 % of respondents regard estimates as “too high,” and more than half say estimates are “far too high.”

At a time of global pessimism, the gloom is no more concentrated anywhere in the world than in Europe. A net 41%t of global asset allocators are underweight euro zone equities. Europe has now assumed the UK’s mantle as the world’s least popular destination for equity investment.

The survey also found U.S. fund managers are now much closer to fully accepting what they expect will be a deep and prolonged U.S. recession.

“In our view, however, it is too soon to say we have reached a bottom in equity markets given the current financial market turmoil,” said Sheryl King, senior US economist at Merrill Lynch.

Oddly enough, we should be relieved by this information because there’s something comforting by an acceptance of an impending or developing recession.

I’d much rather face that than the absolute fear and loathing we saw on markets last week in the global credit panic.

That’s not to say the pressures from the panic have gone: they are still with us, but Wednesday and yesterday’s weakness on global markets was more an old fashioned acceptance that economic activity is sliding and that there will be more pain and suffering before we get through it.

But not an absolute and stunning collapse.

We are not out of the woods by a long way, but if central banks and governments hold their nerves, we could get away with just a severe economic mauling instead of a replay of 1932-33.

So what happened?

The US Fed said that economic activity had worsened across all of its 12 reporting districts across the country with falling activity in retail, financial services, housing, tourism. The Fed’s beige book survey of economic conditions revealed pervasive weakness, with tight credit, deteriorating consumer spending and a weak labour market across the nation.

Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke and the head of the San Francisco Fed, Janet Yellen, both made it clear, in their own way, that there was no quick fix or early rebound for the slumping US economy.

That hopes of a recovery in 2009 were misplaced, and 2010 might see some improvement.

US industrial production fell sharply last month, hit by storms, slumping demand and the credit crunch. The Fed said the drop of 6% was the largest for 24 years and production would have dropped even if there hadn’t been storms in the Gulf and a strike at Boeing.

Another Fed survey in Philadelphia showed a sharp contraction in manufacturing in the area, while the commercial paper market again shrank, but the rate of decline is slowing as the Fed starts lending money to leading companies.

US retail sales fell 1.2% in September, almost double the fall forecast by economists as cars, food and every category saw weakness. Sales on internet auction site, eBay off 1% in the quarter, the first fall in history of the company.

The fall left retail sales 1% lower than a year earlier, signalling that consumers withdrew substantially from US shops and malls in the month.

A leading member of the US Federal Reserve, Janet Yellen, head of the San Francisco Fed describing the US economy as being in “appearing to be in recession” and worryingly warning of the chances of inflation falling away next year in the US to replaced by price deflation.

The New York Fed produced its general economic index that had its worst reading since it started back in 2001, when the last US recession was starting.

In good and bad news, US producer prices fell for a second month in a row as oil and fuel costs fell, and demand eased.

The US Labor Department reported that prices paid to US producers fell 0.4%, while core price rose 0.4%. It’s a sign more and more American companies are finding it tougher passing higher costs on up the production chain.

US consumer price inflation was better than forecast because of the fall in oil prices and slumping demand: they eased 0.1% for the second month in a row and rose 0.1% on a core basis. Inflation over the year to September was up 4.9% from 5.4% in August.

The fall in retail sales was the third in a row, and the deepest: it was driven by that 27% fall in US car sales in the month and falling levels of demand caused by the credit freeze as consumers were refused credit, or stopped buying on the cards.

Economists say that with retail sales down in the September quarter (and consumer spending and credit also lower) its looking certain that real consumption will fall for the first time in a quarter in the US for 17 years.

In Europe, Germany, the continent’s biggest economy, has slashed its growth forecast dramatically.

The German government says growth for 2009 from 1.2% 0.2%, reflecting the rising international risks for the economy, although it warned the precise extent of the slowdown would depend on the severity and duration of the financial crisis.

The new estimate matches the joint forecast published by the country’s leading economic institutes in their regular Autumn report on Tuesday. The institute also issued a worst-case scenario that could see Germany’s economy shrink by 0.8% in 2009..

The fall in retail sales is making US retailers and forecasters increasingly wary about the highly important Thanksgiving-Christmas retailing season: it could be a terrible holiday for consumers, retailers and the economy and analysts now say the US will have its second quarterly slump in economic growth in a row in the December quarter.

Growth this quarter may dip into the red, and that will produce an outright recession by conventional US definitions.

Ms Yellen said the US economy was likely to see “essentially no growth” in the third quarter and that the fourth quarter “appears to be weaker yet, with an outright contraction quite likely.”

“Indeed, the US economy appears to be in a recession,” Yellen said.

Ebay forecast that quarterly sales, fourth-quarter and annual earnings forecasts would fall as growth slows at its web sites.

EBay forecast fourth-quarter revenue of $US2.02 billion to $US2.17 billion, compared with $US2.18 billion in the final quarter of 2007. the company said the value of goods sold on its sites fell 1% in the third quarter, the first drop in the company’s history.

And late in the day the Fed produced its so-called Beige book.

 ”Reports indicated that economic activity weakened in September across all twelve Federal Reserve Districts. Several Districts also noted that their contacts had become more pessimistic about the economic outlook.

“Consumer spending decreased in most Districts, with declines reported in retailing, auto sales and tourism. Nearly all Districts commenting on nonfinancial service industries noted reduced activity. Manufacturing slowed in most Districts.

“Residential real estate markets remained weak, and commercial real estate activity slowed in many Districts. Credit conditions were characterized as being tight across the twelve Districts, with several reporting reduced credit availability for both financial and nonfinancial institutions.

“District reports on agriculture and natural resources were mostly positive, although adverse weather associated with hurricanes Ike and Gustav negatively affected the South and the Midwest. Inflationary pressures moderated a bit in September.”

It was a very gloomy snapshot of an economy heading lower at increasing pace.

The Fed said that shoppers are becoming more price conscious, credit was becoming even harder to come by and this was sapping sales at the nation’s retailers, the report said. Given this, retailers foresee a “weaker economic outlook, including a slow holiday season,” the Fed said.

The survey was released shortly after Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, in a speech in New York, warned that it would take time for the country’s economic health to mend even if badly needed confidence in the US financial system returns and roiled markets stabilize.

In the UK unemployment is on its way to 2 million sometime in the next six months after another rise in August to 1.79 million, or 5.7%. As bad as that is, the rate is still well under America’s 6.1%.

The official figures show that UK jobless rose 164,000 between June and the end of August. The higher-than-expected increase – of 0.5 percentage points to 5.7% was the largest since 1991 and the eighth successive monthly rise. (It’s nine in a row in the US).UK inflation hit an annual rate of 5.2%, a 16 year high.

Our unemployment rate in September rose to 4.3%, where are a long way from the depths of the US and UK economies!

 —–

In Europe, new car sales 8.2% last month as the financial crisis put off potential buyers.The continent’s automakers association said in a statement: “The drop in registrations confirms the aggravating market circumstances, as the fall-out of the financial crisis hits auto manufacturers hard.”

“Customers are increasingly hesitant to make large expenditures and find it more difficult to get their purchase financed.”

ACEA said a total of 1,304,583 new cars were registered in September in the 28 countries it reviewed – the 27 EU member states, minus Cyprus and Malta, plus Iceland, Norway and Switzerland.

—–

In Moscow local bank Globex yesterday banned depositors from withdrawing their money as confidence in the Russian banking system began to show signs of ¬evaporating.Globex is a mid-sized retail bank with assets of $US4 billion, according to the Financial Times. It’s the first Russian bank to experience a run on deposits during the crisis.

It lost 28% of its deposits since the start of last month, according to local analysts.

At least a dozen other Russian banks have reported a sharp rise in withdrawals and account closures.

—–

Hungary was plunged into deeper financial uncertainty overnight with its currency (the forint) and stock market falling sharply and bankers reporting credit shortages, as concern spread across eastern Europe about the impact of the global financial crisis. In Budapest, the forint fell 5.3% to 266 to the euro and the BUX index of leading stocks closed down 12%, dragged down by a 15% fall of price of OTP, the country’s biggest bank. Currencies and stock markets also fell in Poland, the Czech Republic, Romania and Ukraine.The Hungarian turmoil followed moves by leading banks to stop or curtail foreign currency lending, the dominant form of credit in Hungary in recent years.

Analysts now say there’s a rising chance that the inflow of foreign currency will slow, reducing the funds available for financing the country’s current account and putting more pressure on the currency and on the solvency of banks and other financial groups.

The European central Bank will lend 5 billion euros to Hungary to support the currency and the economy.

—–

So what does this mean for Australia?

Rory Robertson is an interest rate strategist at Macquarie Group; here’s his take on what lies ahead for Australia. It’s both positive and negativeBusiness investment is Australia’s “weakest link”

Prospects for business investment have deteriorated sharply across the globe in recent months, as equity prices have imploded, credit conditions have tightened sharply and commodity prices have slumped. Keynes’s famous “animal spirits” have been crushed, pretty well everywhere.

This is a big deal for Australia; because business fixed investment (BFI) is at a multi-decade record 16% of GDP, after having trended higher since the end of the early 1990s recession.

In the 2000s, the uptrend in BFI has been driven by spending buildings and structures, a chunk of it mining-related (see top left of p6 at http://www.rba.gov.au/ChartPack/output_expenditure_activity_fincon.pdf ).

With animal spirits, spending power and commodity prices having turning down as the global credit crunch intensified, BFI will be the weakest link in Australian GDP growth in coming years.

Indeed, if the Australian economy goes into recession, BFI will be the main driver, as always.

Household spending will be relatively strong, particularly now that fiscal and monetary policy are providing a large boost to household cash flows via lower mortgage rates, and income top-ups for families, pensioners and first-home buyers (see below; and note the heavy official focus on mortgage rates rather than business borrowing rates, to this point at least).

Four upbeat factors that give Australia a fighting chance in global downturnAs regular readers are aware, I’ve been a bit of a “doom and gloomer” all year. In a NZ conference call last week, I was asked to say something positive, to highlight any recent positive developments. I highlighted four factors that give the Australian economy a fighting chance in a global recession:• The RBA’s effective policy framework, and plenty of monetary ammunition. The RBA has cut its cash rate by 125bp in the past six weeks, and the standard-variable mortgage rate has fallen by 105bp. The Fed, the ECB and the BOE can only dream of that sort of powerful pass-through.

Moreover, the cash rate still is a relatively high 6%, so there’s plenty of room for lower rates as required. I’m guessing the RBA will cut to a “neutral” 5% by Christmas, dragging mortgage and business rates significantly lower (see further discussion below, and attached RBA Watch).

The dismal lack of co-ordination between Canberra and the States on immigration and housing long has been seen as a problem, putting upward pressure on home prices and rents, and reducing “housing affordability”. Now, Australia’s slow-moving housing-supply response suddenly is a good thing, limiting the size of any future home-price falls (see p4 of http://www.rba.gov.au/ChartPack/output_expenditure_activity_fincon.pdf ).

 

Immigration and home prices

As you know, falling home prices are a major problem in the US, the UK and parts of Europe. The damage done by falling home prices to banks’ balance sheets in these economies – and growing damage to consumer spending – obviously needs to be avoided in Australia. According, while largely unstated, maintaining Australian home prices near current levels now is a major policy priority for the RBA and Canberra.

Aggressive rate cuts obviously help, so too yesterday’s prodding of up-to 150k first-home buyers into action.

In this context, recent reports of growing pressure to reduce our immigration intake are somewhat disturbing.

Recall that, during the early-1990s recession, net immigration collapsed from 170k in 1989 to just 30k in 2003 (lowest four-quarters-ended figure), reinforcing the Australian economy’s tendency to stall.

From a macroeconomic perspective, cutbacks of that order this time around should be avoided like the plague (see Net overseas migration to Australia highest on record: ABS and SMH: Rudd flags cut in migrant numbers )

To recap, all the important policy efforts so far are counter-cyclical in nature: in particular, the RBA’s rate cuts, Canberra’s timely fiscal stimulus, as well as its guaranteeing of aspects of the financial sector, its promotion of mortgage lending and the ban on “short selling” (not to mention the big market-driven drop in the A$).

By contrast, reducing immigration is a pro-cyclical measure, essentially working against the policy initiatives listed above.

RBA policy, lower interest rates, and limiting falls in home pricesThose forecasting big falls in Australian home prices would do well to notice the recent dramatic drop in mortgage rates, with more to come.The correspondingly sharp drops in interest payments relative to household income render much less relevant the elevated debt/income ratios parroted by some.

Comparing stocks with flows typically tells us little worth knowing; comparing interest payments with income (flow/flow) and debt with assets (stock/stock) provides more meaningful information.

With the world economic and financial backdrop having turned so nasty, aggressive RBA easing was/is the most obvious policy response available to support ongoing economic growth.

And in six short weeks, the RBA has demonstrated that its interest-rate tools are far more powerful than those available the Fed, the BOE and most if not all other central banks. Despite much media focus, elevated inter-bank lending rates haven’t stopped big drops in mortgage rates in Australia.

To recap, the story so far:

In Australia, the 84% (105bp/125bp) pass-through so far from the cash rate to standard mortgage rates has greatly surprised the consensus, because when I wrote a note in August headlined “First 50bp of cuts to be ‘passed on’”, many/most were sceptical to say the least.

Importantly, the latest funding assistance provided by the RBA to major home lenders may mean that the next cash-rate cut will pass-through to headline mortgage rates in full.

That is, the RBA last Thursday announced the availability of six-month and one-year repos against “related party” collateral in the form of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) and asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP).

On top of that assistance, Canberra’s announcement on Sunday helps with “term funding” for periods of up to five years (see Expansion Of Domestic Market Facilities and Guarantee of Wholesale Funding and Deposits ).

Critically, recent 1pp-plus drops in cash, BBSW and mortgage rates are gold for Australian home-buyers, providing major cash flow support to the household sector and home prices, something the Fed can only dream about.

That is, despite the funds rate being cut from 5.25% to 1.5%, the rate on (predominant) US 30-year fixed-rate mortgages has dropped by only around 50bp, to 6% or so, when credit is available.

IMPORTANT: AIR reports about financial markets and investment products in the widest sense possible. The AIR website and all its contents is prepared for general information only, and as such, the specific needs, investment objectives or financial situation of any particular user have not been taken into consideration. Individuals should therefore talk with their financial planner or advisor before making any investment decisions.

Australia Reviews is proudly powered by WordPress and FreeUsenext
Entries RSS Comments RSS Log in