A Tale of Two Bidders: Bhp & Xstrata

Uncategorized No Comments »

A tale of two big mining industry takeovers: one with a realistic result, the other where fairyland still rules.

The realistic one was Xstrata, the most acquisitive mining group in the world pulling its $US11 billion ($A12.6 billion) bid for Lonmin, the big platinum miner based in South Africa, but headquartered in London.

In Australia, BHP Billiton welcomed the decision by the competition regulator not to block its 3.4 share bid for Rio Tinto, and BHP and Rio shares stormed higher.

A case of desperate investors here not understanding the changes happening overseas, or eternal optimists, led by the BHP board?

Xstrata said it does not intend to make a takeover offer for Lonmin because of “extreme volatility and uncertainty in the financial markets”.

The “lack of clarity and certainty regarding the future availability of credit introduces significant risks” into financing for any bid, Switzerland-based Xstrata said in a statement.

Xstrata is believed to have lined up a $US15 billion (around $A19 billion) loan from a group of banks to finance its proposed 33 pounds ($A73-a-share) offer and refinance existing debt.

Xstrata had to commit to the bid by tonight, our time, or withdraw. It chose the latter staged a very prudent retreat.

After pulling the bid, it snapped up more than 14% of Lonmin for just over 19 pounds a share and now has an all but controlling 33%.

It’s not the only big international bid to have been killed off by the credit crunch and lending freeze.

Last month a private equity group called off a $A4.2 billion offer for UK events publisher, Informa and HSBC bailed out of a year-long effort to buy 51% of the Korean Exchange Bank for $A8 billion after failing to get the deal finalised and with worries about the global outlook.

Xstrata had built up a 10.7% in Lonmin, but refused to buy any more, even as its target share price sank under the proposed offer price, a good sign of the concern Xstrata was having about the outlook for finance and for commodities.

It snapped up the extra shares after the bid was withdrawn and Lonmin’s price fell.

Despite that Xstrata’s price fell 1.9% in London by the close.

Lonmin replaced its CEO on Monday without warning. Ian Farmer, formerly the chief strategic officer is the new boss and he will drive the company’s review of its existing operations and performance.

Bloomberg estimates that Xstrata has spent about $US28 billion in four years on acquisitions, boosting sales eightfold. It has also ended attempted transactions. The company broke off talks to buy Brazil’s CVRD (Vale), the world’s biggest iron-ore exporter, in April. Xstrata also terminated moves to buy Australia’s WMC Resources in 2005 and Canada’s LionOre Mining International last year after higher bids from rivals.

In Australia, the market was dragged higher by the news that the ACCC would not oppose the proposed BHP Billiton bid for rival Rio Tinto.

Rio shares surged, up $A10.50, or 12.43%, at $95.00, after hitting a high of $98.60. BHP Billiton shares were up $A1.75 or 5.6% at $32.75, after hitting a high of $33.40. The 3.4 BHP shares for every 1 Rio share offer was worth $111.35, a still substantial premium to the actual Rio price and a sign of continuing market scepticism.But BHP shares tumbled 4% in London on the Xstrata news and the worsening outlook for commodities and the global economy.

The ACCC noted that its review of the planned merger had raised “significant concerns”.

“While significant concerns were raised by interested parties in Australia and overseas, the ACCC found that the proposed acquisition would not be likely to substantially lessen competition in any relevant market,” chairman Graeme Samuel said in a statement.

BHP said in a statement:”BHP Billiton today welcomed the decision by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission that it does not object to BHP Billiton’s proposed acquisition of Rio Tinto.”We are very pleased to have received notice that the ACCC will not object to our proposed acquisition of Rio Tinto.

“We have long believed in the benefits of the combination of BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto. Our strategic rationale has always been based on the combined company having an incentive to produce more products, more quickly, to deliver to customers.” BHP Billiton’s Chief Commercial Officer, Alberto Calderon, said.

“Confirmation that the ACCC does not object satisfies the Australian merger control pre-condition of BHP Billiton’s proposed offer for Rio Tinto. In July, the U.S. Department of Justice also announced it would not oppose the transaction. The offer remains subject to the pre-conditions as disclosed in Appendix 1 of the announcement on 6 February 2008.”

The ACCC said in August that market inquiries had raised concerns the merged entity might lessen competition for iron ore and drive up prices of the valuable commodity.

Rio Tinto is the world’s second biggest producer of iron ore, while BHP Billiton is the third largest.

“The ACCC’s inquiries indicated that the merged firm would be unlikely to limit its supply of iron ore given the uncertainty it would face in relation to the profitability of this strategy and the risk that limiting supply would encourage expansions by existing and new suppliers as well sponsorship of alternative suppliers by steel makers,” Mr Samuel said.

Strong opposition to the merger has emerged from steel makers in Asia and Europe amid concerns a combined entity could have enormous control over global iron ore and other resource commodity prices.

“In relation to the supply of iron ore in Australia, market inquiries indicated that steel makers in Australia are unlikely to face higher iron ore lump and iron ore fines prices, based on a move from export parity pricing to import parity pricing,” Mr Samuel said.

The European Commission, the EU’s antitrust regulator, resumed its assessment of the proposal late last month after suspending its investigation in August, to await further information from BHP Billiton.

The commission is expected to rule on the proposed transaction on January 15, 2009.

That is likely to be the deciding factor in whether the bid goes ahead.

BHP says it has a “committed banking financing facility” from a group of banks lead by Barclays Capital, BNP Paribas, Citigroup Global Markets, Goldman Sachs International, HSBC, Banco Santander and UBS.

UBS is a basket case, Santander is bedding down Alliance and Leicester and the parts of Bradford and Bingley it bought at the weekend, Citigroup is coping with taking over Wachovia in the US, Barclays Capital is swallowing most of the US business of Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs is coping with being a fully regulated bank and not an investment bank.

And on top of that, there’s hardly any lending going on and won’t be in the New Year if the bid gets the big tick and happens.

IMPORTANT: AIR reports about financial markets and investment products in the widest sense possible. The AIR website and all its contents is prepared for general information only, and as such, the specific needs, investment objectives or financial situation of any particular user have not been taken into consideration. Individuals should therefore talk with their financial planner or advisor before making any investment decisions.

 

 

A Tale of Two Bidders: Bhp & Xstrata

Uncategorized No Comments »

A tale of two big mining industry takeovers: one with a realistic result, the other where fairyland still rules.

The realistic one was Xstrata, the most acquisitive mining group in the world pulling its $US11 billion ($A12.6 billion) bid for Lonmin, the big platinum miner based in South Africa, but headquartered in London.

In Australia, BHP Billiton welcomed the decision by the competition regulator not to block its 3.4 share bid for Rio Tinto, and BHP and Rio shares stormed higher.

A case of desperate investors here not understanding the changes happening overseas, or eternal optimists, led by the BHP board?

Xstrata said it does not intend to make a takeover offer for Lonmin because of “extreme volatility and uncertainty in the financial markets”.

The “lack of clarity and certainty regarding the future availability of credit introduces significant risks” into financing for any bid, Switzerland-based Xstrata said in a statement.

Xstrata is believed to have lined up a $US15 billion (around $A19 billion) loan from a group of banks to finance its proposed 33 pounds ($A73-a-share) offer and refinance existing debt.

Xstrata had to commit to the bid by tonight, our time, or withdraw. It chose the latter staged a very prudent retreat.

After pulling the bid, it snapped up more than 14% of Lonmin for just over 19 pounds a share and now has an all but controlling 33%.

It’s not the only big international bid to have been killed off by the credit crunch and lending freeze.

Last month a private equity group called off a $A4.2 billion offer for UK events publisher, Informa and HSBC bailed out of a year-long effort to buy 51% of the Korean Exchange Bank for $A8 billion after failing to get the deal finalised and with worries about the global outlook.

Xstrata had built up a 10.7% in Lonmin, but refused to buy any more, even as its target share price sank under the proposed offer price, a good sign of the concern Xstrata was having about the outlook for finance and for commodities.

It snapped up the extra shares after the bid was withdrawn and Lonmin’s price fell.

Despite that Xstrata’s price fell 1.9% in London by the close.

Lonmin replaced its CEO on Monday without warning. Ian Farmer, formerly the chief strategic officer is the new boss and he will drive the company’s review of its existing operations and performance.

Bloomberg estimates that Xstrata has spent about $US28 billion in four years on acquisitions, boosting sales eightfold. It has also ended attempted transactions. The company broke off talks to buy Brazil’s CVRD (Vale), the world’s biggest iron-ore exporter, in April. Xstrata also terminated moves to buy Australia’s WMC Resources in 2005 and Canada’s LionOre Mining International last year after higher bids from rivals.

In Australia, the market was dragged higher by the news that the ACCC would not oppose the proposed BHP Billiton bid for rival Rio Tinto.

Rio shares surged, up $A10.50, or 12.43%, at $95.00, after hitting a high of $98.60. BHP Billiton shares were up $A1.75 or 5.6% at $32.75, after hitting a high of $33.40. The 3.4 BHP shares for every 1 Rio share offer was worth $111.35, a still substantial premium to the actual Rio price and a sign of continuing market scepticism.But BHP shares tumbled 4% in London on the Xstrata news and the worsening outlook for commodities and the global economy.

The ACCC noted that its review of the planned merger had raised “significant concerns”.

“While significant concerns were raised by interested parties in Australia and overseas, the ACCC found that the proposed acquisition would not be likely to substantially lessen competition in any relevant market,” chairman Graeme Samuel said in a statement.

BHP said in a statement:”BHP Billiton today welcomed the decision by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission that it does not object to BHP Billiton’s proposed acquisition of Rio Tinto.”We are very pleased to have received notice that the ACCC will not object to our proposed acquisition of Rio Tinto.

“We have long believed in the benefits of the combination of BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto. Our strategic rationale has always been based on the combined company having an incentive to produce more products, more quickly, to deliver to customers.” BHP Billiton’s Chief Commercial Officer, Alberto Calderon, said.

“Confirmation that the ACCC does not object satisfies the Australian merger control pre-condition of BHP Billiton’s proposed offer for Rio Tinto. In July, the U.S. Department of Justice also announced it would not oppose the transaction. The offer remains subject to the pre-conditions as disclosed in Appendix 1 of the announcement on 6 February 2008.”

The ACCC said in August that market inquiries had raised concerns the merged entity might lessen competition for iron ore and drive up prices of the valuable commodity.

Rio Tinto is the world’s second biggest producer of iron ore, while BHP Billiton is the third largest.

“The ACCC’s inquiries indicated that the merged firm would be unlikely to limit its supply of iron ore given the uncertainty it would face in relation to the profitability of this strategy and the risk that limiting supply would encourage expansions by existing and new suppliers as well sponsorship of alternative suppliers by steel makers,” Mr Samuel said.

Strong opposition to the merger has emerged from steel makers in Asia and Europe amid concerns a combined entity could have enormous control over global iron ore and other resource commodity prices.

“In relation to the supply of iron ore in Australia, market inquiries indicated that steel makers in Australia are unlikely to face higher iron ore lump and iron ore fines prices, based on a move from export parity pricing to import parity pricing,” Mr Samuel said.

The European Commission, the EU’s antitrust regulator, resumed its assessment of the proposal late last month after suspending its investigation in August, to await further information from BHP Billiton.

The commission is expected to rule on the proposed transaction on January 15, 2009.

That is likely to be the deciding factor in whether the bid goes ahead.

BHP says it has a “committed banking financing facility” from a group of banks lead by Barclays Capital, BNP Paribas, Citigroup Global Markets, Goldman Sachs International, HSBC, Banco Santander and UBS.

UBS is a basket case, Santander is bedding down Alliance and Leicester and the parts of Bradford and Bingley it bought at the weekend, Citigroup is coping with taking over Wachovia in the US, Barclays Capital is swallowing most of the US business of Lehman Brothers and Goldman Sachs is coping with being a fully regulated bank and not an investment bank.

And on top of that, there’s hardly any lending going on and won’t be in the New Year if the bid gets the big tick and happens.

IMPORTANT: AIR reports about financial markets and investment products in the widest sense possible. The AIR website and all its contents is prepared for general information only, and as such, the specific needs, investment objectives or financial situation of any particular user have not been taken into consideration. Individuals should therefore talk with their financial planner or advisor before making any investment decisions.

 

 

Recession on the Doorstep, Knocking

Uncategorized No Comments »

Guess what?

That heavy thump you heard from stockmarkets around the world, especially in the US with the 9% fall in the Standard & Poor’s 500 index on Wednesday, was the sound of the last rose coloured glasses falling from the noses of investors, commentators and investment analysts who have finally accepted that the globe is heaving into a recession, led by the tottering US, UK and European economies.After falling Wednesday, European markets again fell heavily Thursday, but the selling wave in the US slowed as investors accepted the new reality. In fact Wall Street bounced strongly in late trading.

Resources were heavily hit as big investors abandoned their last defensive position.

Wednesday and Thursday saw a collection of figures, reports and comments that confirmed that the global economy will drop below the International Monetary Fund’s idea of a global recession in 2009: that’s global growth of 3%.

It is now clear that the US economy is sliding, nastily, but speedily into a slump the like of which we haven’t seen this side of World War 2. US consumers, who carry the US economy on their backs by generating 70% of annual activity, are being battered into submission.

Consumer spending, consumer credit and retail sales are all falling at levels not seen for decades. There is every chance that October’s and November will see declines even sharper than we have seen in August and September.

The monthly investment manager’s survey from Merrill Lynch, released overnight, says “Investors are waiting for the right conditions to return to equity markets amid the most pessimistic outlook yet recorded”

The survey, completed as global equity markets fell in value by 18.7%, shows that almost seven out of 10 respondents (69%) believe that the global economy has entered recession, up sharply from 44% one month ago.

Growing risk aversion has led to a record 49% of respondents who are overweight cash.

The number of respondents who believe equities are undervalued has reached a 10-year high, at 43%.

“Fund managers are waiting for the triggers that will give them the confidence to buy,” said Gary Baker, head of equity strategy at Merrill Lynch.

What they are looking for is a loosening of monetary conditions and for third quarter earnings to clarify where problems and opportunities lie across equity markets.”

But the survey showed that respondents appear to be placing little or no credibility in consensus earnings estimates for the year ahead. A net 92 % of respondents regard estimates as “too high,” and more than half say estimates are “far too high.”

At a time of global pessimism, the gloom is no more concentrated anywhere in the world than in Europe. A net 41%t of global asset allocators are underweight euro zone equities. Europe has now assumed the UK’s mantle as the world’s least popular destination for equity investment.

The survey also found U.S. fund managers are now much closer to fully accepting what they expect will be a deep and prolonged U.S. recession.

“In our view, however, it is too soon to say we have reached a bottom in equity markets given the current financial market turmoil,” said Sheryl King, senior US economist at Merrill Lynch.

Oddly enough, we should be relieved by this information because there’s something comforting by an acceptance of an impending or developing recession.

I’d much rather face that than the absolute fear and loathing we saw on markets last week in the global credit panic.

That’s not to say the pressures from the panic have gone: they are still with us, but Wednesday and yesterday’s weakness on global markets was more an old fashioned acceptance that economic activity is sliding and that there will be more pain and suffering before we get through it.

But not an absolute and stunning collapse.

We are not out of the woods by a long way, but if central banks and governments hold their nerves, we could get away with just a severe economic mauling instead of a replay of 1932-33.

So what happened?

The US Fed said that economic activity had worsened across all of its 12 reporting districts across the country with falling activity in retail, financial services, housing, tourism. The Fed’s beige book survey of economic conditions revealed pervasive weakness, with tight credit, deteriorating consumer spending and a weak labour market across the nation.

Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke and the head of the San Francisco Fed, Janet Yellen, both made it clear, in their own way, that there was no quick fix or early rebound for the slumping US economy.

That hopes of a recovery in 2009 were misplaced, and 2010 might see some improvement.

US industrial production fell sharply last month, hit by storms, slumping demand and the credit crunch. The Fed said the drop of 6% was the largest for 24 years and production would have dropped even if there hadn’t been storms in the Gulf and a strike at Boeing.

Another Fed survey in Philadelphia showed a sharp contraction in manufacturing in the area, while the commercial paper market again shrank, but the rate of decline is slowing as the Fed starts lending money to leading companies.

US retail sales fell 1.2% in September, almost double the fall forecast by economists as cars, food and every category saw weakness. Sales on internet auction site, eBay off 1% in the quarter, the first fall in history of the company.

The fall left retail sales 1% lower than a year earlier, signalling that consumers withdrew substantially from US shops and malls in the month.

A leading member of the US Federal Reserve, Janet Yellen, head of the San Francisco Fed describing the US economy as being in “appearing to be in recession” and worryingly warning of the chances of inflation falling away next year in the US to replaced by price deflation.

The New York Fed produced its general economic index that had its worst reading since it started back in 2001, when the last US recession was starting.

In good and bad news, US producer prices fell for a second month in a row as oil and fuel costs fell, and demand eased.

The US Labor Department reported that prices paid to US producers fell 0.4%, while core price rose 0.4%. It’s a sign more and more American companies are finding it tougher passing higher costs on up the production chain.

US consumer price inflation was better than forecast because of the fall in oil prices and slumping demand: they eased 0.1% for the second month in a row and rose 0.1% on a core basis. Inflation over the year to September was up 4.9% from 5.4% in August.

The fall in retail sales was the third in a row, and the deepest: it was driven by that 27% fall in US car sales in the month and falling levels of demand caused by the credit freeze as consumers were refused credit, or stopped buying on the cards.

Economists say that with retail sales down in the September quarter (and consumer spending and credit also lower) its looking certain that real consumption will fall for the first time in a quarter in the US for 17 years.

In Europe, Germany, the continent’s biggest economy, has slashed its growth forecast dramatically.

The German government says growth for 2009 from 1.2% 0.2%, reflecting the rising international risks for the economy, although it warned the precise extent of the slowdown would depend on the severity and duration of the financial crisis.

The new estimate matches the joint forecast published by the country’s leading economic institutes in their regular Autumn report on Tuesday. The institute also issued a worst-case scenario that could see Germany’s economy shrink by 0.8% in 2009..

The fall in retail sales is making US retailers and forecasters increasingly wary about the highly important Thanksgiving-Christmas retailing season: it could be a terrible holiday for consumers, retailers and the economy and analysts now say the US will have its second quarterly slump in economic growth in a row in the December quarter.

Growth this quarter may dip into the red, and that will produce an outright recession by conventional US definitions.

Ms Yellen said the US economy was likely to see “essentially no growth” in the third quarter and that the fourth quarter “appears to be weaker yet, with an outright contraction quite likely.”

“Indeed, the US economy appears to be in a recession,” Yellen said.

Ebay forecast that quarterly sales, fourth-quarter and annual earnings forecasts would fall as growth slows at its web sites.

EBay forecast fourth-quarter revenue of $US2.02 billion to $US2.17 billion, compared with $US2.18 billion in the final quarter of 2007. the company said the value of goods sold on its sites fell 1% in the third quarter, the first drop in the company’s history.

And late in the day the Fed produced its so-called Beige book.

 ”Reports indicated that economic activity weakened in September across all twelve Federal Reserve Districts. Several Districts also noted that their contacts had become more pessimistic about the economic outlook.

“Consumer spending decreased in most Districts, with declines reported in retailing, auto sales and tourism. Nearly all Districts commenting on nonfinancial service industries noted reduced activity. Manufacturing slowed in most Districts.

“Residential real estate markets remained weak, and commercial real estate activity slowed in many Districts. Credit conditions were characterized as being tight across the twelve Districts, with several reporting reduced credit availability for both financial and nonfinancial institutions.

“District reports on agriculture and natural resources were mostly positive, although adverse weather associated with hurricanes Ike and Gustav negatively affected the South and the Midwest. Inflationary pressures moderated a bit in September.”

It was a very gloomy snapshot of an economy heading lower at increasing pace.

The Fed said that shoppers are becoming more price conscious, credit was becoming even harder to come by and this was sapping sales at the nation’s retailers, the report said. Given this, retailers foresee a “weaker economic outlook, including a slow holiday season,” the Fed said.

The survey was released shortly after Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, in a speech in New York, warned that it would take time for the country’s economic health to mend even if badly needed confidence in the US financial system returns and roiled markets stabilize.

In the UK unemployment is on its way to 2 million sometime in the next six months after another rise in August to 1.79 million, or 5.7%. As bad as that is, the rate is still well under America’s 6.1%.

The official figures show that UK jobless rose 164,000 between June and the end of August. The higher-than-expected increase – of 0.5 percentage points to 5.7% was the largest since 1991 and the eighth successive monthly rise. (It’s nine in a row in the US).UK inflation hit an annual rate of 5.2%, a 16 year high.

Our unemployment rate in September rose to 4.3%, where are a long way from the depths of the US and UK economies!

 —–

In Europe, new car sales 8.2% last month as the financial crisis put off potential buyers.The continent’s automakers association said in a statement: “The drop in registrations confirms the aggravating market circumstances, as the fall-out of the financial crisis hits auto manufacturers hard.”

“Customers are increasingly hesitant to make large expenditures and find it more difficult to get their purchase financed.”

ACEA said a total of 1,304,583 new cars were registered in September in the 28 countries it reviewed – the 27 EU member states, minus Cyprus and Malta, plus Iceland, Norway and Switzerland.

—–

In Moscow local bank Globex yesterday banned depositors from withdrawing their money as confidence in the Russian banking system began to show signs of ¬evaporating.Globex is a mid-sized retail bank with assets of $US4 billion, according to the Financial Times. It’s the first Russian bank to experience a run on deposits during the crisis.

It lost 28% of its deposits since the start of last month, according to local analysts.

At least a dozen other Russian banks have reported a sharp rise in withdrawals and account closures.

—–

Hungary was plunged into deeper financial uncertainty overnight with its currency (the forint) and stock market falling sharply and bankers reporting credit shortages, as concern spread across eastern Europe about the impact of the global financial crisis. In Budapest, the forint fell 5.3% to 266 to the euro and the BUX index of leading stocks closed down 12%, dragged down by a 15% fall of price of OTP, the country’s biggest bank. Currencies and stock markets also fell in Poland, the Czech Republic, Romania and Ukraine.The Hungarian turmoil followed moves by leading banks to stop or curtail foreign currency lending, the dominant form of credit in Hungary in recent years.

Analysts now say there’s a rising chance that the inflow of foreign currency will slow, reducing the funds available for financing the country’s current account and putting more pressure on the currency and on the solvency of banks and other financial groups.

The European central Bank will lend 5 billion euros to Hungary to support the currency and the economy.

—–

So what does this mean for Australia?

Rory Robertson is an interest rate strategist at Macquarie Group; here’s his take on what lies ahead for Australia. It’s both positive and negativeBusiness investment is Australia’s “weakest link”

Prospects for business investment have deteriorated sharply across the globe in recent months, as equity prices have imploded, credit conditions have tightened sharply and commodity prices have slumped. Keynes’s famous “animal spirits” have been crushed, pretty well everywhere.

This is a big deal for Australia; because business fixed investment (BFI) is at a multi-decade record 16% of GDP, after having trended higher since the end of the early 1990s recession.

In the 2000s, the uptrend in BFI has been driven by spending buildings and structures, a chunk of it mining-related (see top left of p6 at http://www.rba.gov.au/ChartPack/output_expenditure_activity_fincon.pdf ).

With animal spirits, spending power and commodity prices having turning down as the global credit crunch intensified, BFI will be the weakest link in Australian GDP growth in coming years.

Indeed, if the Australian economy goes into recession, BFI will be the main driver, as always.

Household spending will be relatively strong, particularly now that fiscal and monetary policy are providing a large boost to household cash flows via lower mortgage rates, and income top-ups for families, pensioners and first-home buyers (see below; and note the heavy official focus on mortgage rates rather than business borrowing rates, to this point at least).

Four upbeat factors that give Australia a fighting chance in global downturnAs regular readers are aware, I’ve been a bit of a “doom and gloomer” all year. In a NZ conference call last week, I was asked to say something positive, to highlight any recent positive developments. I highlighted four factors that give the Australian economy a fighting chance in a global recession:• The RBA’s effective policy framework, and plenty of monetary ammunition. The RBA has cut its cash rate by 125bp in the past six weeks, and the standard-variable mortgage rate has fallen by 105bp. The Fed, the ECB and the BOE can only dream of that sort of powerful pass-through.

Moreover, the cash rate still is a relatively high 6%, so there’s plenty of room for lower rates as required. I’m guessing the RBA will cut to a “neutral” 5% by Christmas, dragging mortgage and business rates significantly lower (see further discussion below, and attached RBA Watch).

The dismal lack of co-ordination between Canberra and the States on immigration and housing long has been seen as a problem, putting upward pressure on home prices and rents, and reducing “housing affordability”. Now, Australia’s slow-moving housing-supply response suddenly is a good thing, limiting the size of any future home-price falls (see p4 of http://www.rba.gov.au/ChartPack/output_expenditure_activity_fincon.pdf ).

 

Immigration and home prices

As you know, falling home prices are a major problem in the US, the UK and parts of Europe. The damage done by falling home prices to banks’ balance sheets in these economies – and growing damage to consumer spending – obviously needs to be avoided in Australia. According, while largely unstated, maintaining Australian home prices near current levels now is a major policy priority for the RBA and Canberra.

Aggressive rate cuts obviously help, so too yesterday’s prodding of up-to 150k first-home buyers into action.

In this context, recent reports of growing pressure to reduce our immigration intake are somewhat disturbing.

Recall that, during the early-1990s recession, net immigration collapsed from 170k in 1989 to just 30k in 2003 (lowest four-quarters-ended figure), reinforcing the Australian economy’s tendency to stall.

From a macroeconomic perspective, cutbacks of that order this time around should be avoided like the plague (see Net overseas migration to Australia highest on record: ABS and SMH: Rudd flags cut in migrant numbers )

To recap, all the important policy efforts so far are counter-cyclical in nature: in particular, the RBA’s rate cuts, Canberra’s timely fiscal stimulus, as well as its guaranteeing of aspects of the financial sector, its promotion of mortgage lending and the ban on “short selling” (not to mention the big market-driven drop in the A$).

By contrast, reducing immigration is a pro-cyclical measure, essentially working against the policy initiatives listed above.

RBA policy, lower interest rates, and limiting falls in home pricesThose forecasting big falls in Australian home prices would do well to notice the recent dramatic drop in mortgage rates, with more to come.The correspondingly sharp drops in interest payments relative to household income render much less relevant the elevated debt/income ratios parroted by some.

Comparing stocks with flows typically tells us little worth knowing; comparing interest payments with income (flow/flow) and debt with assets (stock/stock) provides more meaningful information.

With the world economic and financial backdrop having turned so nasty, aggressive RBA easing was/is the most obvious policy response available to support ongoing economic growth.

And in six short weeks, the RBA has demonstrated that its interest-rate tools are far more powerful than those available the Fed, the BOE and most if not all other central banks. Despite much media focus, elevated inter-bank lending rates haven’t stopped big drops in mortgage rates in Australia.

To recap, the story so far:

In Australia, the 84% (105bp/125bp) pass-through so far from the cash rate to standard mortgage rates has greatly surprised the consensus, because when I wrote a note in August headlined “First 50bp of cuts to be ‘passed on’”, many/most were sceptical to say the least.

Importantly, the latest funding assistance provided by the RBA to major home lenders may mean that the next cash-rate cut will pass-through to headline mortgage rates in full.

That is, the RBA last Thursday announced the availability of six-month and one-year repos against “related party” collateral in the form of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) and asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP).

On top of that assistance, Canberra’s announcement on Sunday helps with “term funding” for periods of up to five years (see Expansion Of Domestic Market Facilities and Guarantee of Wholesale Funding and Deposits ).

Critically, recent 1pp-plus drops in cash, BBSW and mortgage rates are gold for Australian home-buyers, providing major cash flow support to the household sector and home prices, something the Fed can only dream about.

That is, despite the funds rate being cut from 5.25% to 1.5%, the rate on (predominant) US 30-year fixed-rate mortgages has dropped by only around 50bp, to 6% or so, when credit is available.

IMPORTANT: AIR reports about financial markets and investment products in the widest sense possible. The AIR website and all its contents is prepared for general information only, and as such, the specific needs, investment objectives or financial situation of any particular user have not been taken into consideration. Individuals should therefore talk with their financial planner or advisor before making any investment decisions.

Know How To Transfer And Reside In Australia

Uncategorized No Comments »

Are you dreaming of some lovely powder white sand beaches? Have you ever wondered how nice it is to carry a koala? Can’t think of any but to come close enough to know you are near the Great Barrier Reef? If you have these thoughts in mind, then it is time for you to learn how to migrate to Australia.

Most people think that just like any migration process, going to Australia can be a daunting task. They are right, but it does not necessarily mean that the process is just the same. At some point, some people may say that it is hard to pass through the immigration. Yes, it is, but it is not impossible to get through it and live in Australia.

The question is how?

There are many things to consider before even thinking about the migration itself. It is important that you understand these things for you to be able to cope with the requirements of the country’s migration rules.

1. Point out the important things first

When migrating or planning to migrate to Australia, you need to point out the most important things first so you can set your priorities.

First, you need to understand that before you can migrate, you need to secure an Australian visa. If you are a citizen of New Zealand, you need not follow this process.

Next, you have to understand that not all applicants for migration can have the chance. Granting Australian visa will be subject for review and evaluation as deemed appropriate by the Australian Migration. It is also important to note that the rules change from time to time and may vary depending on the situation and as mandated by the court or federal standards.

You need to consider your qualifications as well for a specific class since Australian visas have various subclasses based on specific criteria and conditions. If ever you have applied in the wrong subclass or if you were not able to meet the requirements specified in a particular class, your application will be declined and your application fees will not be refunded.

Lastly, even if there is no discrimination in Australia as far as religion, race, and gender are concerned, you need to understand that the migration laws consider age, criminal background, visa history, and some medical factors. If you fall below par on these factors, then your application will most likely be declined.

2. Know the Aussie life

Don’t be tempted to live in Australia just because your friend says the place is great or because you want to simply live somewhere else other than your current residence now. To successfully live and enjoy the beautiful environment in Australia, it is important that you know how it is to live in such place.

Certain factors that need to be considered would be the climate, lifestyle, cost of living, language, and among others.

3. Job hunting

Of course, without the means to survive, migrating to Australia may not seem to be a good idea. Before finalizing your intentions and before shedding out some money for the application, it is important that you know you can make a living there to support your needs. Identify your expertise and search for possible jobs you may find in Australia. Learning your chances for your career is more important than the actual migration itself. So, before you pack your things and get ready to go, research on this matter first.

There are a hundred factors to consider before you decide on migrating to Australia. These are just a few of them. But keeping this information handy will definitely help you ease out through the process.

Australia Reviews is proudly powered by WordPress and FreeUsenext
Entries RSS Comments RSS Log in